Stokes' theorem has a surprising consequence: the flux of a curl through a surface depends only on the surface's boundary curve. Any two surfaces with the same edge, oriented to match, give the same answer. So a hard surface integral of $\nabla \times \mathbf{F}$ can be replaced by an easy one, usually over a flat disk, or by the line integral around the edge.
Idea clave
Por qué funciona
Only for curls. For a general field $\mathbf{F}$, the flux through two surfaces with the same edge can differ; the difference is the total divergence of $\mathbf{F}$ in the solid between them.
Worked examples
Ejemplo resuelto: Swap a paraboloid for a disk
- $\nabla \times \mathbf{F} = \langle 0 - 0, 0 - 0, 3x^2 + 3y^2 \rangle$.
- The boundary is the circle $x^2 + y^2 = 4$, $z = 0$. Use the flat disk $D$ with upward normal $\mathbf{k}$ instead.
- $$\iint_D 3(x^2 + y^2)\,dA = \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^2 3r^2 \cdot r\,dr\,d\theta = 2\pi \cdot 12 = 24\pi.$$
Respuesta: ${}24\pi$
Ejemplo resuelto: A closed surface
- The sphere is closed: it has no boundary curve.
- So the flux of any curl through it is ${}0$, no computation needed.
Respuesta: ${}0$
Ejemplo resuelto: An open can
- The boundary of $S$ is the bottom circle. The outward normal on the side, with the right-hand rule, sends it counterclockwise seen from above.
- The bottom disk with upward normal has the same oriented boundary. There $\nabla \times \mathbf{F} = \langle 0, 0, 2 \rangle$, so the flux is ${}2 \cdot \pi = 2\pi$.
Respuesta: ${}2\pi$